When Saving The World is Unconstitutional
Sep. 20th, 2021 11:48 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sphagnumThe agendas pushed forward by the World Economic Forum and the Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation are all wrong, but there is no question about the fact that, on the face of it, they are intended to save the world. These agendas imply measures that are also completely and obviously unconstitutional practically everywhere where there is a constitution. This an often overlooked fact. It means that the elites have gone rogue, and in many places have no realistic way back.
I think we need to understand the real source of all of this interesting developments if we want to successfully engage politically, personally and spirituality with the new reality. And I think it is not that difficult to understand. Once understood, everything becomes a lot clearer.
The first thing to understand is that the form of the problem these agendas are trying to solve inevitably imply genocidal, authoritarian and socialist solutions simply by their form. This is like a mathematical theorem and a fundamental truth. You literally cannot think about solving the problem of overpopulation without thinking abut how to get rid of excess people. You see? "excess people". If you declare that there cannot be such a thing as excess people, then there cannot be overpopulation.
The cop out is that another way to achieve this is by reducing birth rates enough. Which means esentially no more children. Which must be enforced some way, and I dare you to come up with a scheme which isn't either genocidal or authoritarian socialist, or both. Bonus points if it is not simply flat out horrible, whatever it is.
The same occurs when thinking about global warming. If you decide to solve this problem (without genocide, see above), then inevitably you devise an authoritarian and socialist solution simply because of the form of the problem. It is "our planet". It is about the future of humanity. Reducing emissions inevitably implies rationing energy, which in turn implies complete and total control. And if you don't agree with that much control then you are irredeemably bad because you sabotage the future of humanity.
All of this is set in motion by the feeling in these circles that something has to be done. And their idea seems to be a bizarre version of the soviet union where the hope for growth is not there, replaced by a degrowth and impoverishing agenda. They hope this will work because AI, science, and technology will sort out the details.
It seems they have developed this huge restructuring plan, and removal of constitutional barriers is factored in. And since it is for saving the world, they feel they have the heavenly mandate. This is something to keep in mind when considering what will happen. There are is multiple levels of treason and very heavy crimes involved, and large swaths of the elites are staffed now by criminals.
And finally, as the cherry on this magnificent cake, there is plenty of evidence that the organizations behind the reorganization of the world simply do not know what they are doing. It is rather clear to me that they didn't expect that massive resistance to the vaccination and the vaccine passports. They seem to be completely tone deaf, destroying the credibility of the institutions they needed to work their magic, and generally out of touch with reality. And how could it be otherwise? The life of Bill Gates does not resemble ours except in the mundane biological sense. Klaus Schwab is a nerd fascinated with AI and genetic engineering, but clearly doesn't understand anything of that in any depth. Both, and everybody else in these circles, took the pipe dream part of science and discarded the limitations.
It is important to understand that this is the result of a mechanism: if we are a group of people trying to save the world, and you find a problem in each plan we come up with, then eventually you will not be invited anymore. The result of this simple process is that the staff at these institutions is a distillate of people who can believe absurd things and defend them using the absurdist rhetoric we have come to witness everywhere. They really believe this stuff. Just like the Soviet leaders believed their stuff at the beginning of the revolution and many years more.
We tend to discard the statements of these people as lies, but I think that is mostly because the thoughts they communicate are so alien to us that we often flat out refuse to believe someone could say such thinks sincerely. Of course the world they are envisioning will serve them best. If you or I were to do that, our envisioned world would suit us. The greed they display is their default way of functioning, really nothing new. It's just the way they are. I think Bill is genuinely obsessed with injecting everybody, and the whole thing even makes sense if you adopt the thought framework he and the whole PMC uses by default, which sees lives as statistics and the details (happiness, love, etc) as irrelevant romanticism. His money has deformed the WHO, through grants, fellowships, joint initiatives, etc. to the point it works at least in part primarily as his hobby.
What can be done about all this? I wish I knew.
I think we need to understand the real source of all of this interesting developments if we want to successfully engage politically, personally and spirituality with the new reality. And I think it is not that difficult to understand. Once understood, everything becomes a lot clearer.
The first thing to understand is that the form of the problem these agendas are trying to solve inevitably imply genocidal, authoritarian and socialist solutions simply by their form. This is like a mathematical theorem and a fundamental truth. You literally cannot think about solving the problem of overpopulation without thinking abut how to get rid of excess people. You see? "excess people". If you declare that there cannot be such a thing as excess people, then there cannot be overpopulation.
The cop out is that another way to achieve this is by reducing birth rates enough. Which means esentially no more children. Which must be enforced some way, and I dare you to come up with a scheme which isn't either genocidal or authoritarian socialist, or both. Bonus points if it is not simply flat out horrible, whatever it is.
The same occurs when thinking about global warming. If you decide to solve this problem (without genocide, see above), then inevitably you devise an authoritarian and socialist solution simply because of the form of the problem. It is "our planet". It is about the future of humanity. Reducing emissions inevitably implies rationing energy, which in turn implies complete and total control. And if you don't agree with that much control then you are irredeemably bad because you sabotage the future of humanity.
All of this is set in motion by the feeling in these circles that something has to be done. And their idea seems to be a bizarre version of the soviet union where the hope for growth is not there, replaced by a degrowth and impoverishing agenda. They hope this will work because AI, science, and technology will sort out the details.
It seems they have developed this huge restructuring plan, and removal of constitutional barriers is factored in. And since it is for saving the world, they feel they have the heavenly mandate. This is something to keep in mind when considering what will happen. There are is multiple levels of treason and very heavy crimes involved, and large swaths of the elites are staffed now by criminals.
And finally, as the cherry on this magnificent cake, there is plenty of evidence that the organizations behind the reorganization of the world simply do not know what they are doing. It is rather clear to me that they didn't expect that massive resistance to the vaccination and the vaccine passports. They seem to be completely tone deaf, destroying the credibility of the institutions they needed to work their magic, and generally out of touch with reality. And how could it be otherwise? The life of Bill Gates does not resemble ours except in the mundane biological sense. Klaus Schwab is a nerd fascinated with AI and genetic engineering, but clearly doesn't understand anything of that in any depth. Both, and everybody else in these circles, took the pipe dream part of science and discarded the limitations.
It is important to understand that this is the result of a mechanism: if we are a group of people trying to save the world, and you find a problem in each plan we come up with, then eventually you will not be invited anymore. The result of this simple process is that the staff at these institutions is a distillate of people who can believe absurd things and defend them using the absurdist rhetoric we have come to witness everywhere. They really believe this stuff. Just like the Soviet leaders believed their stuff at the beginning of the revolution and many years more.
We tend to discard the statements of these people as lies, but I think that is mostly because the thoughts they communicate are so alien to us that we often flat out refuse to believe someone could say such thinks sincerely. Of course the world they are envisioning will serve them best. If you or I were to do that, our envisioned world would suit us. The greed they display is their default way of functioning, really nothing new. It's just the way they are. I think Bill is genuinely obsessed with injecting everybody, and the whole thing even makes sense if you adopt the thought framework he and the whole PMC uses by default, which sees lives as statistics and the details (happiness, love, etc) as irrelevant romanticism. His money has deformed the WHO, through grants, fellowships, joint initiatives, etc. to the point it works at least in part primarily as his hobby.
What can be done about all this? I wish I knew.
no subject
Date: 2021-09-21 08:29 am (UTC)I think the main source of trouble for the elites will be organic resistance. You can't get the Soviet Union without the corruption, hustle, and generalized dysfunction. People will care for themselves and their own, and will find a way.